“Tulsi Gabbard feeds MAGA an Obama conspiracy.”
Tulsi Gabbard feeds MAGA an Obama conspiracy by releasing declassified intelligence files accusing the Obama administration of a “treasonous conspiracy” to undermine Trump’s 2016 victory. This explosive reveal comes amid intensified scrutiny of Jeffrey Epstein documents—and experts are questioning whether it’s a strategic diversion. The move delivers a dramatic pivot in political conversation, threatening to reshape narratives around the election, national security, and the Epstein fallout.
Gabbard Releases Declassified Files
Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as Director of National Intelligence, publicly declassified over 100 pages of internal communications—emails and intelligence memos—asserting that Obama-era officials, including James Comey, John Brennan, and James Clapper, orchestrated a deliberate shift in Russia-related intelligence. According to Gabbard, these actions were aimed at framing Donald Trump as compromised, effectively amounting to a “years-long coup” that manipulated public opinion through intelligence leaks and media narratives.
The documents—particularly a December 9, 2016 NSC meeting summary—detail an instruction to assemble a new intelligence report that contradicted earlier assessments indicating Russia likely did not manipulate election infrastructure. Gabbard argues this sudden pivot was politically motivated, citing testimony that officials “created” a Russia narrative for political gain.
Alarm Bells from Capitol Hill
Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman Sen. Mark Warner issued a sharp reprimand, calling Gabbard “not competent” and warning that her political maneuvering could damage relationships with international allies, particularly within the Five Eyes alliance. Warner further underscored that bipartisan investigations confirm significant Russian interference in the 2016 election—precisely undermining Gabbard’s premise.
Other Democrats argue Gabbard’s timing suggests a calculated effort to deflect attention from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the Epstein files. With public demand rising to release Epstein-related grand jury transcripts, they suggest Gabbard’s bombshell is a distraction tactic.
The Epstein Context: A Strategic Diversion?
On July 19, former President Trump pressed the DOJ for fuller disclosure of Epstein-related grand jury records, igniting fierce debate over whether the released documents could implicate more high-profile individuals. Politico notes the timing of Gabbard’s allegations is “suspicious” and could be interpreted as a “smokescreen” from Trump’s circle, designed to shift focus during a moment of political vulnerability.
Some Republicans have applauded Gabbard’s initiative as exposing deeper government failures and rooting for accountability. But critics, pointing to a parallel Reddit thread, dismiss it as yet another political stunt:
“Basically, it’s a bait and switch… The problem is the issue being investigated was never about hacking vote counts… The allegations against Obama are…merely partisan theater.”
Is Gabbard Rewriting History?
Gabbard’s release revives the once-settled question of whether the January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) was politically tainted. She emphasizes that earlier assessments found no direct vote tampering—yet a later report shifted focus to broader influence operations. New York Post
Opponents argue her narrative mischaracterizes intelligence consensus, pointing to enduring findings from Mueller’s investigation and multiple IC conclusions on Russian electoral meddling. Senate and independent experts maintain that while vote tally manipulation wasn’t proven, substantial interference occurred in hacking operations, data leaks, and information warfare. The Daily Beast
Legal Fallout & Next Steps
Gabbard has formally referred the declassified materials to the DOJ, urging investigations and potential prosecutions of former Obama officials. She asserts that “no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law.”
However, with the DOJ and Senate Democrats contesting her characterizations—and strong evidence of Russian interference—the likelihood of criminal referrals is uncertain. The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, released years ago, affirmed Russian malign efforts, standing in stark contrast to Gabbard’s claims.
Meanwhile, Gabbard’s moves may be leveraged by Trump’s circle to buy time or redirect media attention during intensified scrutiny of Epstein-related disclosures.
Conclusion
Tulsi Gabbard’s decision to feed MAGA an Obama conspiracy is the latest high-stakes pivot in an already polarized political environment. By intertwining allegations of treason with the Epstein narrative, she fuels the partisan divide—prompting volatile reactions across Capitol Hill and conservative media.
Whether this marks a turning point in public opinion, an effective distraction, or a strategic political gambit remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Gabbard’s bold release has reignited debates over intelligence integrity, partisan loyalty, and the unresolved fallout from the Epstein investigation.
“Subscribe to trusted news sites like USnewsSphere.com for continuous updates.”
